Hong Kong wild about Daly

John Daly and the Hong Kong Golf Club make an incongruous pair. Daly is the “wild thing” of world golf, who only two weeks ago was reported to have spent 24 hours in a north Carolina jail sobering up after a heavy bout of drinking.

The Hong Kong Golf Club is the ultimate in decorum, with an atmosphere that still exudes the elite British colonial days on which its tradition is built.

But, they’ve been together before and there’s no better place than thousands of miles from home for Daly to start afresh.

The American two-time major champion has signed up to play in the Hong Kong Open next week, the second stop on the European Tour’s inaugural Race to Dubai schedule.

The 42-year-old, who has won the US PGA Championship and British Open in his career, has had it tough lately, seeing his ranking plunge to 783 in the world.

But he can still draw the crowds and that alone is enough to make sponsors willing to take a chance on a man who rarely makes cuts and has a penchant for chaos and partying despite many attempts to clean up his act.

In one tournament this year, a sponsor’s representative remarked that Daly’s mere presence, even though he failed to make the cut and spent his free days drinking in the marquee, was worth up to US$40,000 in additional on-course ticket sales.

That was echoed by Hong Kong Golf Association chief executive Iain Valentine, who said in the South China Morning Post:

“He could add thousands to the gate next week. He’s a popular guy, despite his problems. He’ll be a great draw, everyone knows him and thousands will come to see him. I’m sure he will conduct himself very well, like he did last time he was here.”

The big man’s previous appearance in Hong Kong was 10 years ago when he admitted “choking” while challenging for the lead and ending up in a tie for 19th.

Daly, who these days also peddles autographed souvenirs, golf teaching aids, merchandise and his autobiography while on the road, was reported to have approached organisers for a place in the tournament, according to reports in Hong Kong. The newspaper quoted promoter Martin Capstick as saying:

“He came to us. While it’s come out the blue, it is not a complete surprise. I understand he is keen to join the European Tour and get a good start in the Race to Dubai. Daly still has lots of fans in Hong Kong and around the region. He is a wonderfully talented golfer.”

PGA Tour announces richer 2009 season

US PGA Tour officials had insisted that the current global credit crunch would not have a major impact on the circuit. And, as if to prove a point, on Wednesday they announced their 2009 schedule, featuring 25 tournaments that includes a “Texas swing”.

Overall prize money increases to $222.9 million from $214.4 million this year with each tournament worth at least $6 million.

With the European Tour’s Race to Dubai set to provide stiff competition, the PGA Tour knows it must stay relevant to keep the best players. And raising prize money is a good way to do it.

Tour commissioner Tim Finchem was quoted by AP as saying that the circuit was healthy and that charitable donations in 2008 reached a record $123 million. He said:

“I’m delighted to say that the demise of the PGA Tour has been overstated considerably. The tournaments and their sponsors have worked extremely hard during this difficult economic time to sustain their significant charitable contributions.”

However, the PGA Tour has yet to provide details on the 2009 FedEx Cup, the end-of-season play-off of four tournaments worth $10 million to the overall winner.

Europe’s Dubai World Championship at the end of the 2009 season will be worth $10 million to the winner from an overall prize pool of $20 million.

The Texas swing will be featured during the spring time after the Valero Texas Open in San Antonio was brought back from autumn to May 14-17. After this comes the HP Byron Nelson Championship outside Dallas and the Crown Plaza Invitational at Colonial in Fort Worth.

Garcia claims second spot after Shanghai victory

Spain’s Sergio Garcia became the first winner of a European Tour Race to Dubai event when he triumphed at the HSBC Champions tournament in Shanghai, China, which thrust him into second place in the world rankings.

Garcia, who has suffered numerous play-off disappointments in his career, this time came out on top as he beat England’s Oliver Wilson in the second play-off hole to win at the Sheshan International Golf Club.

He started the last day two shots behind Wilson but stormed back with a final round of four-under-par 68 as Wilson came home with 70.

Both players finished on 274, one stroke ahead of Australia’s former US Open champion Geoff Ogilvy and Sweden’s Peter Hanson.

In the play-off, Garcia and Wilson scored pars on the first hole. Wilson then missed a 10-foot birdie putt on the second play-off hole while Garcia holed his attempt from seven feet.

The tournament is the first event on the European Tour’s 2009 calendar, the Race to Dubai, which replaces the Order of Merit.

The Spaniard is now looking forward to next year and the possibility of a first-ever major title. He is even thinking about challenging top-ranked Tiger Woods for the world number one spot. He said in an Asian Tour press release:

“I think my next goal is to try to win a major. I’ve been trying for quite a while, but winning a major would be the next goal. Taking over Tiger as the world’s number one depends a little bit on how much Tiger takes off and if I keep playing well, it’s possible, mainly because he’s been injured.”

British Open and US PGA Championship winner Padraig Harrington, of Ireland, finished joint 11th after his total of 281.

Alone in third place was Sweden’s Henrik Stenson with 277, followed one stroke further back by Aussie Adam Scott and South African Charl Schwartzel.

American Phil Mickelson, last year’s winner, and Thailand’s Prayad Marksaeng were together on 279.

On the US PGA Tour, veteran Davis Love III set himself up for life when won the Children’s Miracle Network Classic at Disney World in Lake Buena Vista, Florida.

It was his 20th title on the tour and first in two years, as he closed with an eight-under-par 64 for a one-shot win over Tommy Gainey, who had a 68.

Love finished with a total of 25-under 263, with Gainey on 264 and Scott Verplank and Steve Marino tied for third on 268.

With the title, the 44-year-old Love gave himself a lifetime exemption on the tour.

Jewel of Asia eager to sparkle

Next week, the 2009 European Tour stops at what many call the “Jewel in the Crown” of Asian golf – the Hong Kong Open.

For me, the tournament has special meaning because I grew up in Hong Kong and covered the event more than a dozen times as a journalist.

The golf was only part of the fun. There were fellow journalists from all parts of the world, top players and a major trek, by Hong Kong standards, to get to the course in Fanling at the Hong Kong Golf Club – previously Royal Hong Kong Golf Club.

It is more than a 90-minute journey from town, which is considerable in tiny Hong Kong and, for me, involved a bus ride, subway with change of trains, over-land train and taxi. We’d have to get into a train packed with people, many of whom on the way to nearby China.

Indeed, if you go to the highest point of the Old Course and crane your neck over the trees, you would probably see the bustling southern Chinese city of Shenzhen.

On more than a few occasions, I’ve seen international golfers, heavy golf bags slung across shoulders, who had missed the tournament bus from their hotel, squeezed in with the locals as they rush to make tee-off time.

The Hong Kong Open is the oldest professional sporting event in the former British colony and the second-oldest golf tournament in Asia.

During my early years of covering the tournament, it was popular but faced an annual struggle to find sponsors.

Now co-sanctioned by the European Tour and Asian Tour, it is playing a big part in the new Race to Dubai, featuring twice as the European circuit adjusts its schedule to fit inside a calendar year by 2010.

This year’s field has some good names in Nick Faldo, Colin Montgomerie – both old Hong Kong hands, South African Rory Sabbatini, Graeme McDowell, Jeev Milkha Singh, Michael Campbell, Bernard Langer, defending champion Miguel Angel Jimenez and Jose Maria Olazabl.

Nine of the tournament’s past winners have been major champions – Olazábal, Langer, Padraig Harrington, Tom Watson, Ian Woosnam, Greg Norman, Orville Moody, Peter Thomson and Kel Nagle.

Goosen ends 21-month drought with Johor victory

It took an Asian Tour fling for South African Retief Goosen to end a 21-month run without a title to his name.

The two-time US Open champion came good on the final round to shoot a six-under-par 66 and register a two-stroke victory at the Iskandar Johor Open in the southern Malaysian city of Johor Bahru.

Goosen was the big-name replacement for Fijian Vijay Singh, who was looking forward to competing at the Royal Johor course where he developed his game but was eventually forced to withdraw through injury.

The South African took full advantage of his invitation to win the tournament on 12-under 276, two ahead of Thailand’s Thaworn Wiratchant and three in front of third-placed Australian Kane Webber, who finished on 279.

Goosen was four shots behind the leaders after the third round but his bogey-free final-day effort enabled him to leapfrog his rivals and claim the title.

It was Goosen’s first win since the Qatar Masters in early 2007, in addition to his 29th international triumph and fourth Asian Tour victory. He said in an Asian Tour press release:

“It means a lot. It’s been a drought. Coming down the stretch, you haven’t won for a while, so it’s nice to finish it off with some good shots and I got the job done. It’s great to win again. It’s been a tiring week walking these hills but it was well worth it.”

On the US PGA Tour, Ryan Palmer overcame a penalty stroke that he had called on himself to win the Ginn sur Mer Classic in Palm Coast, Florida.

He called the penalty in the ninth hole and then bogeyed the 10 before holing a 10-foot birdie putt on the 18th to emerge from a six-way tie and take the first prize.

It was his second tour victory as he scored 71 in the final round for a total of seven-under 281. That was one stroke ahead of a pack of five golfers – George McNeill, Nicholas Thompson, Vaughn Taylor, Ken Duke and Michael Letzig.

Meanwhile, Denmark’s Soren Kjeldsen became the final winner of the Volvo Masters when he scored a two-stroke victory at Valderamma.

Kjeldsen shot a 71 for a eight-under-par total of 276. That was good enough for first place, two strokes ahead of Germany’s Martin Kaymer, who closed with 68.

Robert Karlsson finished joint 32nd but that was good enough to make him the first Swede to win the European Order of Merit – and the last player to do so with the European Tour set to be revamped next season.

Tiger may be back for Masters, says coach

It hasn’t come from the horse’s mouth but close enough. If Tiger Woods’ coach, Hank Haney, has got it right, then the world number one will be back in time for April’s US Masters in Augusta.

Woods’ last outing was June’s US Open at Torrey Pines, where he won the title after an exhausting 19-hole play-off with Rocco Mediate.

That event was his first tournament after coming back from knee surgery following his second place at the 2008 US Masters at Augusta. His US Open exertions aggravated that injury, requiring more surgery, which has kept him sidelined ever since.

For his next comeback, however, Haney believes Woods should compete in a few preparatory tournaments before tackling Augusta. Newsmax, citing The Scotsman, quoted Haney as saying:

“I’m sure his target is to be ready for the Masters. But to do that properly, he’ll have to play a couple of times before he gets to Augusta. He can’t just show up not having played for so long. I know he pulled it off at the US Open, but 10 months is a long time. He needs to have played some serious golf, maybe two events, before April. That sounds like a reasonable goal.”

Woods absence, according to many reports, has had a negative impact on world golf with television audiences and attendances down.

The PGA Tour could also really use Woods’ drawing power with the revamped European Tour offering increased prize money. Indeed, several American players such as Anthony Kim and Phil Mickelson have expressed interest in playing on the European Tour, which culminates in November 2009 with the $20 million Dubai World Championship.

For Woods, the downside is the ligament that needed repairs will never be 100 per cent again. To counter this, he is working on protecting the ligament by strengthening the muscles that surround it.

Do You Make These 5 Mistakes Playing Golf?

Knowing The Rules of Golf and not making mistakes on the course can save you many strokes over the course of a year. I was recently asked the following 5 questions and wondered how many others are unsure of the rules and consequently making mistakes on the course.

I hope you enjoy reading these 5 rules of golf questions and answers:

#1 RULES OF GOLF QUESTION:

“If I play a shot into a bunker and its flooded, there is no way i can play it and no where i can drop it in the bunker and its not GUR , am I allowed to drop in another bunker no nearer the hole if there is one with no penalty.. Many thanks.”

#1 RULES OF GOLF ANSWER:

“This is a question that regularly arises. A player is NOT permitted to drop their ball in another bunker, not nearer the hole, if their ball lies submerged in casual water in a bunker.

Under Rule 25-1b(ii) there are two options if a player’s ball lies in an abnormal condition (e.g. casual water) in a bunker and they choose to take relief. They may lift their ball and drop it either:

(a) Without penalty, in the bunker within one club-length of and not nearer the hole than the nearest point of relief from where the ball lies or, if complete relief is impossible, as near as possible to the spot where the ball lay, but not nearer the hole, on a part of the course in the bunker that affords maximum available relief from the condition; or

(b) Under penalty of one stroke, outside the bunker, keeping the point where the ball lay directly between the hole and the spot on which the ball is dropped, with no limit to how far behind the bunker the ball may be dropped.

To summarise these two options, the first one allows the player to drop in the shallowest part of the water in the bunker, not nearer the hole, without penalty, and the second one allows the player to drop outside of the bunker, on a line from the flagstick through where the ball is at rest, under penalty of one stroke.”

#2 RULES OF GOLF QUESTION:

“In a 4-ball-better-ball game, Player A partners B while Player C partners D. They all arrive on a Par 4 in two with Player A some 25 ft from the hole, Player B 10 ft from the hole, Player C 15 ft from the hole and Player D 6 ft from the hole. Player A putted first to 3 ft short of the hole. Then Player C’s turn; he putted to 4 ft passed the hole but in front of his partner, Player C. Player B putted to within 6 inches from the hole and tapped in for a par. Player C then decided to put before his partner and holed in for a par. Player D then putted in for a birdie. Have Player C & D violated any rules of golf?”

#2 RULES OF GOLF ANSWER:

“Neither C nor D has breached any Rule of Golf, whether the incident occurred in match play or stroke play, as they are partners on the same side. Rule 30-3b states; ‘Balls belonging to the same Side may be played in the order the Side considers best.’

I trust this clarifies the situation.”

#3 RULES OF GOLF QUESTION:

“I have a question for you. I am learning to play golf. I was shown how to check your aim by laying a club across your feet to check alignment. I did this out on the course while preparing for my second shot. My partner said that doings so was illegal. What is the rule regarding that? Is it legal from the tee box? I see it done all the time.”

#3 RULES OF GOLF ANSWER:

“The answer to your question lies is within Rule 8-2a; ‘Any mark placed by the player or with his knowledge to indicate the line must be removed before the stroke is made.’

Decision 8-2a/1 is the relevant one;

Q. A player places a club on the ground parallel to the line of play to assist him in aligning his feet properly. Is this permissible?

A. Yes, provided the player removes the club before playing his stroke. Otherwise, a breach of Rule 8-2a would occur.

So, whether you are on the teeing ground or anywhere else on the course, you may line yourself up by placing a club on the ground providing you pick it up before making your stroke.”

#4 RULES OF GOLF QUESTION:

“Can sand be removed to identify a golf ball in a bunker? If not and it is subsequently learned a wrong ball has been played is there a penalty or not?”

#4 RULES OF GOLF ANSWER:

“The Rule on this situation changed on 1st January 2008. A player may now identify his ball anywhere on the course, including in a hazard, providing the correct procedure is followed; ‘Before lifting the ball, the player must announce his intention to his opponent in match play or his marker or a fellow-competitor in stroke play and mark the position of the ball. He may then lift the ball and identify it, provided that he gives his opponent, marker or fellow-competitor an opportunity to observe the lifting and replacement. The ball must not be cleaned beyond the extent necessary for identification when lifted under Rule 12-2.’

Rule 12-1 covers the situation where a ball is covered by sand; ‘In a hazard, if a ball is believed to be covered by loose impediments or sand, the player may remove by probing or raking with a club or otherwise, as many loose impediments or as much sand as will enable him to see a part of the ball. If an excess is removed, there is no penalty and the ball must be re-covered so that only a part of the ball is visible. If the ball is moved during the removal, there is no penalty; the ball must be replaced and, if necessary, re-covered. The player must then replace the ball and restore the previous lie as closely as possible.'”

#5 RULES OF GOLF QUESTION:

“I have a question for you on the rules. I was playing our 16th hole and hit my second shot into an unplayable lie amongst some gorse bushes. I decided to take 2 club lengths no nearer the hole under penalty of 1 shot. When I dropped my ball it bounced and hit the head of my driver. I didn’t really think anything of this because my ball was still in an awful position and continued to play the ball as it lay.

On of my playing partners said I should incur a 2 shot penalty. I was unsure about this rule and said we should check once we had completed the round.

The consensus of opinion at the club house was that a 2 shot penalty was appropriate. I duly applied the 2 shot penalty and signed my card. However this was still niggling me.

I have since found out that I should have re-dropped the ball because it was an illegal drop and made sure it did not hit any part of my golf gear. However finding this out after the event and signing my card didn’t give me any great pleasure.

In these circumstances what should I have done:

1) Disqualify myself
2) Accept the 2 shot penalty, which was the consensus of opinion.
3) Argue that I received no benefit from the ball striking my driver and not give myself a 2 shot penalty.
4) Explain the situation to the competion committe and let them decide.
5) An Alternative action.

this may seem petty but I was on a reasonable score and could have beaten my handicap and if not at least been in the buffer zone so there is a serious side to the question.”

#5 RULES OF GOLF ANSWER:

“The answers to your questions are all to be found in Rule 20. Firstly, there is no penalty if your dropped ball strikes your equipment but you must drop the ball again within the Rules (Rule 20-2a). When you failed to drop the ball again and played your ball from where it lay you incurred a penalty of two strokes for playing your ball from the wrong place (Rule 20-7ii). However, as you did not gain a significant advantage as a result of playing from this wrong place the Committee would not be justified in disqualifying you (Note 1 to Rule 20).

So, my direct answers to your questions are;
1. No.
2. Yes.
3. No.
4. It is always best to do this if you have played from wrong place.
5. Not applicable.”


Disclaimer: Whilst every attempt has been made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of this information on the Rules of Golf I am human and have been known to be wrong! Neither I, nor anyone connected with GolfSwingSecretsRevealed.com, shall be held responsible for any losses caused by reliance upon the accuracy or reliability of such information. Readers should refer to the full text of the rules and decisions as published in the official publications of the R&A and the USGA, The Rules of Golf 2008-2011 and Decisions on the Rules of Golf 2008-2009.

Kim signs up, Lefty ponders European move

With US$20 million up for grabs in next year’s Race to Dubai, the European Tour appears to have perked the interest of a few high-profile Americans.

Rising star Anthony Kim has already indicated that he would like to play in Europe next season, and now Phil Mickelson says he is inclined towards gaining European Tour membership.

The Race to Dubai replaces the European Tour’s Order of Merit. It starts in November and culminates next year with the Dubai World Championship, where the $20 million is at stake.

From 2010 onwards, the European calendar will start from January, instead of November.

Mickelson, a three-time major winner, said the US PGA Tour is stagnating and he hopes to play the 12 European events that will make him eligible to contest the Dubai finale. Talking by phone to AFP about whether the Singapore Open would become part of the European set-up, he said:

“It would be very helpful for me because I love playing in Singapore. If it were to become a European Tour event it would be great for me as it would be included as one of the now 12 events that you need to play to become a European Tour member. Although I haven’t yet joined the European Tour, it is something I am certainly considering.”

Kim is one of a number of PGA Tour regulars who have signed up for Europe. Among the others is Colombian sensation Camilo Villegas.

Kim, 23, established himself as a top-class golfer in 2008, winning two PGA tournaments and rising to number eight in the world.

He paid the European Tour membership fee of £3,280, enabling him to try his hand at qualifying for the Dubai World Championship.

Spain’s Sergio Garcia said in an AP article that he expects other players to move across the pond to play more European events. He said:

“Anytime you get players from the calibre of Camilo and Anthony into the tour, it’s great. Some of the tournaments we play in the Middle East … are bigger than the ones they play in the US. You get good players there, so world rankings points increase. At the end of the day, that’s what the big players do it for.”

Although some of the biggest names in golf are set to boost the European Tour, the biggest of them all, Tiger Woods, is unlikely to be among them. Woods has already said that his schedule would not allow him the time to meet Race to Dubai qualifications.

Beckman gives himself two-year lifeline

Cameron Beckman had already filled out his application for qualifying school next year. Even then, he was still thinking of quitting the game altogether.

At 447 in the world rankings and an injury-ravaged season, the 38-year-old was seriously considering his options for the future, golfing or otherwise.

As it turned out, a tap-in for par helped to shape his future, at least for the next two years. That putt, in a play-off against Kevin Sutherland, gave him victory at the Frys.com Open in Scottsdale, Arizona and earned him a two-year exemption on the PGA Tour.

It also earned him US$900,000 and, suddenly, the future doesn’t look so bleak. Beckman said in an AP article:

“It’s just been a tough year. I honestly was thinking about quitting the game. That’s how bad I felt. I can’t explain to you how good I feel right now. I don’t know what it was and why I did it, but I just felt good all day. I sat down with my wife and said, `What do you think?’ I honestly was just trying to finish in the top 150 so I’d get to the qualifying school finals.”

Beckman won the tournament on the second play-off hole after finishing tied with Sutherland in regulation, having made a stunning comeback to force extra holes.

He was four shots adrift of Sutherland after nine holes but fought back with birdies on five of the next seven holes.

Beckman closed with a seven-under-par 63 for a total of 18-under 262. Sutherland finished with a 66 to finish tied with Beckman while Matthew Goggin was alone on third with 263 after his closing 63.

Seven-under 63 proved a popular closing score with Mike Weir signing off his card with it as he ended on 266, tied for fourth with J.J. Henry.

Meanwhile, Sergio Garcia won for the first time on the European Tour in three years when he triumphed at the Castello Masters Costa Azahar.

Garcia, who dedicated his victory to ailing countryman Seve Ballesteros, shot a four-under-par 67 in the final round for a total of 20-under 264 and a three-stroke victory over Sweden’s Peter Hedblom, who closed with a 66.

Two shots further back was another Swede, Alexander Noren, who finished on 65 for his 269.

Englishmen Simon Dyson and David Lynn and Denmark’s Soren Kjeldsen shared third place on 270, all three signing off with 69s.

‘Grandma’ Alfredsson wins in China

Experience won the day as Sweden’s veteran player Helen Alfredsson won the fist ever LPGA Tour tournament to be held in China on Sunday.

The 43-year-old Afredsson shot a final round of seven-under-par 65 to register a come-from-behind victory over Taiwan’s Tseng Yani at the Hainan West Coast Golf Clubon the island of Hainan.

She totalled 12-under-par 204 in the 54-hole event to take home the winner’s cheque of US$270,000. Tseng carded a final round of 68 to finish on nine-under 207.

Laura Diaz, who led after the first round, fired 72 to finish in third place on 206 while 36-hole leader Karen Stupples, of England, was fourth on 209 after her 75.

Chinese fans could celebrate a relatively strong finish for their leading player, Feng Shanshan, the first exempt player from China to play on the LPGA Tour.

She finished sixth, closing with a 68 for a total of 211. It was her fifth top-10 finish in her inaugural year on the tour.

Sweden’s world number two Annika Sorenstam, who is retiring from competitive golf at the end of the year, finished in joint 17th place. Top Americans Christie Kerr and Morgan Pressel were tied 34th and 52nd respectively.

Afredsson, nicknamed “Grandma” by Tseng last week in Hawaii, is experiencing a comeback of sorts, rising to eighth in the world before the China tournament. In a press release from tournament organisers, she was quoted as saying:

“I think when you play golf, you don’t always think about age. But the diversity on our Tour, on the LPGA, it’s so great. You have people from everywhere. Shanshan is a wonderful girl from China that you should be very proud of. It keeps everybody young and it keeps everybody competitive. They don’t want to get beat by us, because we are so old, and we still want to beat them, because they are so young.”

How To Take Relief From GUR And Common Misconceptions

Here is a rules of golf question I received today, it covers key points relating to GUR and some misconceptions. It made sense to share it with everyone.

RULES OF GOLF QUESTION:

“If a player has established his point of relief from a GUR, ( right hand side of the GUR ) which is aprox. 10 meters from the green, and uses his 3 wood to measure this, and then uses the same wood to measure his 2 club lengths allowed for his free drop, and then proceeds to use his wedge to play the next shot – does the player get a penalty for not measuring the first from the GUR with his wedge? If so, how many penalty strokes?

RULES OF GOLF ANSWER:

“The definition of ‘nearest point of relief’ includes these words; ‘In order to determine the nearest point of relief accurately, the player should use the club with which he would have made his next stroke if the condition were not there to simulate the address position, direction of play and swing for such a stroke. Notice that it says ‘should’. In other words there is no penalty for using a different club. However, a Committee would be justified in giving a warning, and then some form of sanction, to someone who deliberately ignored this explicit recommendation in the Rules.

The next point is important. When taking relief from GUR, an abnormal ground condition, the player must drop the ball, without penalty, within ONE club-length of and not nearer the hole than the nearest point of relief. Believing that the relief is within TWO club-lengths is a common mistake made by golfers. The two club-length relief applies to situations where the player incurs a penalty, e.g. one of the options for an unplayable ball, or opting to take relief from a lateral water hazard.

On your second point Rule 4-4 states ‘For the purpose of measuring, a player may use any club he has selected for that round’. Therefore there is nothing to stop a player from using a 3 wood, a driver, or even a long-handled putter, providing he uses one of his own clubs.

However, using a long-handled putter is considered by some to be poor etiquette and I would avoid doing this.”

Visit here for more Rules of Golf questions.


Disclaimer: Whilst every attempt has been made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of this information on the Rules of Golf I am human and have been known to be wrong! Neither I, nor anyone connected with GolfSwingSecretsRevealed.com, shall be held responsible for any losses caused by reliance upon the accuracy or reliability of such information. Readers should refer to the full text of the rules and decisions as published in the official publications of the R&A and the USGA, The Rules of Golf 2008-2011 and Decisions on the Rules of Golf 2008-2009.

Woods returns to Torrey Pines as bag man

“I hear you’re looking for a caddie. I’m Tiger Woods.” With these words, the best golfer in the world returned to the scene of his last competitive outing – Torrey Pines in San Diego.

True to his words, Woods, who won the US Open at the course in June before taking the rest of the year off for surgery, carried the bag for 59-year-old John Abel.

New Jersey native Abel, who described it as a “once in a lifetime experience”, earned his round with Tiger after winning the “Tee It Up with Tiger” Buick sweepstakes contest.

Going through the course and riding on a customised cart to ensure his patched up knee wasn’t at risk, Woods handed Abel clubs, helped him line up putts and reminisced about his epic June play-off victory over Rocco Mediate.

Woods, who remembered the 19th hole putt that won him his 14th major title, accompanied Abel for the nine holes of the South Course that he played and revelled in his new role, as he was quoted as saying in the media:

“You know, that was pretty cool. It was a little bit different atmosphere, because you could actually see the green without all of the grandstands. I remember that putt.”

Since undergoing surgery to repair a ligament in his knee, Woods has yet to swing a club in anger. He is still going through the recovery process and wouldn’t put a date on his return to the circuit. He said:

“I’m able to chip and putt now, but the fuller rotational things will come next year. I don’t know how I’ll be ramping up and what my surgeons will allow. I can walk and do all of this stuff. That’s easy. It’s the rotational stuff that’s going to be different.”

Twenty Rules Of Golf Every Golfer Should Know

Over the next couple of months I plan to post many of the rules of golf questions and answers I have specifically written for golfers. This way everyone can learn a little more about the rules.

I hope you enjoy reading these 20 rules of golf questions and answers:

#1 RULES OF GOLF QUESTION:

“A golf ball is embedded/plugged in its own pitch mark in the bunker wall – the sand section. It can barely be seen. Is there any relief?”

#1 RULES OF GOLF ANSWER:

“There is no relief from a ball embedded in a bunker.

Decision 13/4 states;

‘Q. A player’s ball is completely embedded in the vertical lip of a bunker. The lip is not grass-covered, so it is part of the bunker. Is the ball considered to be lying through the green? If so, the player would be entitled to drop the ball behind the bunker if he deems it unplayable.

A. No. An embedded ball is considered to be lying in the part of the course where it entered the ground.’

Under the Rules the only place where a player gets relief for a ball embedded in its own pitch-mark is in ‘any closely mown area through the green’ (Rule 25-2).”

#2 RULES OF GOLF QUESTION:

“A few weeks back I entered the monthly medal at my club. I didn’t play well (again) and signed off for a net 78. My card was marked and signed correctly by my playing partner and myself. I duly entrered my scores into our club computer but it seems that I forgot to press the enter button!

My club then disqualified me. I informed him that as far as I was aware I had done everything right within the rules and just because I forgot to press a button on a computer should not mean I should have been disqualified. I was told that I had not entered my score correctly and was DQ, simple as that. I disagreed as what would have happened in the old days before computers?”

#2 RULES OF GOLF ANSWER:

“I suggest that you refer the person that disqualified you to Decision 6-6b/8;

‘Q. May a Committee, as a condition of competition, provide that a competitor must enter his score into a computer?

A. No. Such a condition would modify Rule 6-6b.’

Therefore, under the Rules of Golf the score card, as signed by the player and the marker, is the official record of the round for purposes of the competition.

But you should be aware of the continuation of that same Decision; ‘However, while it is not permissible to penalize a player under the Rules of Golf for failing to enter his score into a computer, a Committee may, in order to assist in the administration of the competition, introduce a “club regulation” to this effect and provide disciplinary sanctions (e.g., ineligibility to play in the next club competition(s)) for failure to act in accordance with the regulation.’

Under the Rules the Committee were not entitled to disqualify you for the competition in which you did not correctly record your score on the Club’s computer system, but they could have ‘disciplined’ you for a future competition if it was in their ‘club regulations’. In my opinion this would be totally unfair as you had made an attempt to enter your score in the computer but had made a simple error in doing so.”

#3 RULES OF GOLF QUESTION:

“Can you give me a ruling on:

If a player hits through the green into a water hazard, where do you take the drop?

Do you have to keep the water hazard between you and your intended target or drop at point of entry or replay your shot from its original position?”

#3 RULES OF GOLF ANSWER:

“This is a situation that confuses many golfers. Assuming that the player decides that the ball cannot be played from within the water hazard there are two options under Rule 26-1, ‘If a ball is in a water hazard, or if it is known or virtually certain that a ball that has not been found is in a water hazard (whether the ball lies in water or not), the player may under penalty of one stroke:

a) Play a ball as nearly as possible at the spot from which the original ball was last played (see Rule 20-5); or

b) Drop a ball behind the water hazard, keeping the point at which the original ball last crossed the margin of the water hazard directly between the hole and the spot on which the ball is dropped, with no limit to how far behind the water hazard the ball may be dropped’.

So, to answer your question, the important words are ‘keeping the point at which the original ball last crossed the margin of the water hazard directly between the hole and the spot on which the ball is dropped’. You will see that in your question the place where the ball last crossed the margin of the hazard was on the far side of the green to where the stroke was played from. Therefore, the place where the ball must be dropped under option b) is on the far side of the water hazard. In other words, the player’s next stroke will have to be played over the water hazard on the far side of the putting green from where he last played from, under penalty of one stroke.”

#4 RULES OF GOLF QUESTION:

“I Do NOT ground my club before playing off the fairway, [or any where for that matter]. This I do as I believe having NOT grounded my club, I have not addressed the ball. Therefore if it moves I am not deemed to have made a stroke. I think this includes me inadvertently touching it during waggle?

Do you agree?”

#4 RULES OF GOLF ANSWER:

“You are quite correct. A player has “addressed the ball” when he has taken his stance and has also grounded his club, except that in a hazard a player has addressed the ball when he has taken his stance.

Therefore, if you do not ground your club you have not addressed it (other than in a hazard). Touching your ball inadvertently does not change this situation, unless off course your ball moves of its spot when you do so, when a penalty of one stroke is incurred and the ball must be replaced.”

#5 RULES OF GOLF QUESTION:

“I had a challenging situation yesterday. Whilst driving at the 15th my ball fell into the water. There are yellow stakes around the water. My partner suggested that I reload and I hit a beautiful, straight and long shot onto the fairway ( don`t know why I couldn`t do that the 1st time). I finished playing and when we got back to the club house the people who were playing behind us complained that what I did was wrong.

They did not have a problem with me hitting the second ball from the tee because that was my choice but teeing the second ball was the issue.

They said I can only tee the second ball if the 1st one goes out of bounds or if I cannot find my 1St ball (lost ball). They maintain that in my case I can drop the ball at the tee or anywhere near the yellow stakes but I am not supposed to tee the 2nd ball ot use the peg.

Please help clarify, this left a bitter taste in my partner`s mouth because he has been playing for some years now and he thought he understands the rules.”

#5 RULES OF GOLF ANSWER:

“Tell your partner that he can relax because he was correct. As he quite rightly suggested, one of the relief options under Rule 26-1 for a ball lost in a water hazard is to play a ball as nearly as possible at the spot from which the original ball was last played. Rule 20-5 states, ‘When a player elects or is required to make his next stroke from where a previous stroke was made, he must proceed as follows:

a. On the Teeing Ground: The ball to be played must be played from within the teeing ground. It may be played from anywhere within the teeing ground and may be teed.’

So you were quite within your rights to tee up the ball anywhere within the teeing ground.

Incidentally, the group behind were also wrong if they said that you could drop a ball ‘anywhere near the yellow stakes’. Under Rule 26-1 the only other option if your ball is lost in a water hazard is to, ‘drop a ball behind the water hazard, keeping the point at which the original ball last crossed the margin of the water hazard directly between the hole and the spot on which the ball is dropped, with no limit to how far behind the water hazard the ball may be dropped.’

This might be near the yellow stakes or may be many yards away, but in either case it has to be somewhere on an extension of the line from the hole through where the ball last crossed the margin of the hazard.”

#6 RULES OF GOLF QUESTION:

” I have some rubber tees for a driving mat. I am wondering if they are legal with the USGA to use on the course? If so I would rather use them. What I like about them is they are always the same height and won’t break and you can always find them, they don’t go far after hitting the ball.”

#6 RULES OF GOLF ANSWER:

“The definition says, ‘A “tee” is a device designed to raise the ball off the ground. It must not be longer than 4 inches (101.6 mm), and it must not be designed or manufactured in such a way that it could indicate the line of play or influence the movement of the ball.’

Therefore, I see no reason why your rubber tees do not meet this specification and can therefore be used in competition.”

#7 RULES OF GOLF QUESTION:

“Please can you clarify something for me from a rules perspective.

A player is lying 2 on a Par 3 and has about a 4 metre putt for par. As he addresses the ball his putter touches the ball which does a half roll forward and then settles back into its original position. The player then hits his putt and sinks it for a par.

What is the ruling? Must he take a 4 for the ball moving, although resting in original position, or does he record a 3.”

#7 RULES OF GOLF ANSWER:

“A ball is only deemed to have ‘moved’ if it leaves its position and comes to rest in any other place. Also, Rule 18-2a(i) permits a player to touch his ball in the act of addressing it. So, in the situation that you describe no penalty has been incurred.

This is confirmed in Decision 18/2, ‘Q. In addressing the ball, a player accidentally causes the ball to oscillate, but it returns to its original position. Has the ball ‘moved’ A. No.’

Thus the player recorded a 3.”

#8 RULES OF GOLF QUESTION:

“At my home course, hole # 11 runs parallel to hole # 15 ( in opposite directions). In between the two is an old train rail bed, which is out of bounds on both fairways. ( it is used as an access road for the grounds crew) My question is, if you hit a tee shot off either hole and it crosses the out of bounds stakes on the hole being played and crosses the out of bounds stakes in the parallel hole and lands in the fairway of the parallel hole, is the ball still in play?”

#8 RULES OF GOLF ANSWER:

“Decision 27/20 answers your question;

‘Q. A public road defined as out of bounds divides a course. A ball crosses the road and comes to rest on the part of the course on the other side of the road. Is the ball out of bounds?

A. No. Since the ball lies on the course, it is in bounds unless a Local Rule provides otherwise. However, because it is unfair that a ball on the road is out of bounds and a ball beyond it is in bounds, it is suggested that the following Local Rule should be adopted:

A ball which crosses a public road defined as out of bounds and comes to rest beyond that road is out of bounds, even though it may lie on another part of the course.

So, in your question the ball is in bounds unless there is a Local Rule that declares otherwise. You will see that the USGA and R&A would approve of such a Local Rule being introduced in these circumstances.”

#9 RULES OF GOLF QUESTION:

“How should mixed competition be held?

Should the ladies play from the men’s tee?

The ladies handicap is given according to the ladies’ tee. So would it be fair to make the ladies play from men’s tee with the same handicap?”

#9 RULES OF GOLF ANSWER:

“Unfortunately, I cannot give you a definitive answer to your question as it is not covered by the Rules of Golf but by a Rule of Competition, as defined by the course or Club Committee.

However, I can tell you that, in my experience, for most mixed competitions the men play from their tees off their stroke indexes and the ladies play from their tees off their (usually different) stroke indexes.

There is a Decision on the Rules, which is relevant to your question; Decision 29-2:

Q. In a mixed foursome in which the men play from the back tees and the women play from the forward tees, a man hits a tee shot out of bounds. Does his partner play the next stroke from the back tee or the forward tee?

A. The partner must play from the back tee.”

#10 RULES OF GOLF QUESTION:

“My friends and I were discussing some rules of golf when this one came up.

A person hits a ball towards the green, they look around for the ball but could not find it and the player declares the hole lost, then he finds the ball in the hole and tries to say he’s won the hole.

One of my friends says this right. Could you please clarify this point for me.”

#10 RULES OF GOLF ANSWER:

“Your friend was correct in that the person who found his ball in the hole won the hole, assuming of course that his score on that hole was lower than his opponent. The reason is that the ball is out of play as soon as it is holed out and cannot therefore be lost or the hole conceded.

Decision 2-4/11 is relevant as it confirms the principle involved;

Q. In a match, A played his second shot towards the green but he could not find his ball. He conceded the hole to B, whose second shot was on the green. The following players then found A’s ball in the hole. What is the ruling?

A. Since a player may not concede a hole after conclusion of the hole ‘Rule 2-4’. A holed out in two strokes and won the hole if he made a claim before B played from the next teeing ground (Rule 2-5). If A did not do so, he lost the hole.”

#11 RULES OF GOLF QUESTION:

“I once saw Mickelson use a wedge on a putting green to approach a very distant hole, instead of the putter. I understand the expected club to use on the green is a putter, but there is no explicit rule against using any other club, is there? If so, even if the player in this case were completely on the green, could he take his stance and use any club for his next shot?”

#11 RULES OF GOLF ANSWER:

“You are quite right, there is no Rule of Golf that prohibits a player from using any of his clubs on the putting green of the hole being played. However, if you do find yourself in a situation where you have to chip a ball from the putting surface make sure that you completely repair any damage to the surface that your stroke leaves.

You are probably aware that Rule 25-3 states that a player may not play a stroke from any putting green other than the one being played, though he is permitted to take his stance on a green in order to play a stroke at his ball that lies just of the putting surface.”

#12 RULES OF GOLF QUESTION:

“I once hit a bunker rake on a second fairway shot and it made a large hole in my ball. At other times on my course I may hit a cemented pathway, a rock, etc. and the ball will come out damaged or with very deep cuts or cracked. Can I replace the ball?”

#12 RULES OF GOLF ANSWER:

“Yes, Rule 5-3 states that, ‘a ball is unfit for play if it is visibly cut, cracked or out of shape. A ball is not unfit for play solely because mud or other materials adhere to it, its surface is scratched or scraped or its paint is damaged or discolored.’

If you suspect that your ball may be unfit for play during play of a hole you must be careful to follow the procedure laid down in the Rules,’Before lifting the ball, the player must announce his intention to his opponent in match play or his marker or a fellow-competitor in stroke play and mark the position of the ball. He may then lift and examine it, provided that he gives his opponent, marker or fellow-competitor an opportunity to examine the ball and observe the lifting and replacement. The ball must not be cleaned when lifted under Rule 5-3.’ Failure to comply with any part of this procedure incurs a penalty of one stroke. If the ball is unfit for play under the above definition it may be substituted without penalty. Of course, any ball may be substituted between the play of holes.”

#13 RULES OF GOLF QUESTION:

“What could happen in a tournament if a golfer did not submit their original scorecard for a Stableford Competition and instead submitted a regular scorecard and filled in the numbers to match the original scorecard?”

#13 RULES OF GOLF ANSWER:

“The answer to your question is in Decision 6-6/7;

Q. At the end of a round in stroke play, a competitor returns to the Committee a score card different from the one issued by the Committee at the start of the round (e.g., because the original score card was lost or illegible due to wet weather). The new score card contained the competitor’s name and scores and was signed by both him and his marker. Should the score card be accepted?

A. Yes.”

#14 RULES OF GOLF QUESTION:

“The opponents ball was hit approx 10 meters further than mine on the fairway after we teed off. I then took a short iron to further hit the ball to the green, in the process I took a divot, which then landed on top of the opponent’s ball. What is the ruling when they have to remove the chunk of grass form the ball?”

#14 RULES OF GOLF ANSWER:

“A principle of the Rules of Golf is that a player is entitled to the lie which his stroke gave him. Accordingly, in equity (Rule 1-4) your opponent could not only have removed your divot lying against his ball, without penalty, but he could also have lifted and cleaned any grass or earth that was deposited on his ball as a result of your stroke. Decision 13-2/8.5 rules on similar circumstances.”

#15 RULES OF GOLF QUESTION:

“When a white line is not present, i.e. just stakes, why can’t clubs attach some weather proofed chord to each post as this will surely help to more easily determine the actual OOB line?”

#15 RULES OF GOLF ANSWER:

“I certainly agree that all out of bounds should be marked as clearly as possible and ropes or chains between the posts are a good idea to identify those areas. However, under the Rules, when out of bounds is defined by reference to stakes, the out of bounds line is determined by the nearest inside points at ground level of the stakes, not by the ropes or chains between them.”

#16 RULES OF GOLF QUESTION:

“Would it be possible for you to send me the rule on the 3 option, when you take a penalty in a bunker”

#16 RULES OF GOLF ANSWER:

“I believe that you are referring to when you declare your ball unplayable in a bunker. The three options, under Rule 28, all incurring a penalty of one stroke, are;

a. Play a ball as nearly as possible at the spot from which the original ball was last played (see Rule 20-5); or

b. Drop a ball in the bunker behind the point where the ball lay, keeping that point directly between the hole and the spot on which the ball is dropped, with no limit to how far behind that point the ball may be dropped; or

c. Drop a ball in the bunker within two club-lengths of the spot where the ball lay, but not nearer the hole.

There is another situation when a player’s ball lies in an abnormal ground condition in a bunker (e.g. casual water); ‘Rule 25-1b. If the ball is in a bunker, the player must lift the ball and drop it either:

(a) Without penalty, in accordance with Clause(i) above, except that the nearest point of relief must be in the bunker and the ball must be dropped in the bunker or, if complete relief is impossible, as near as possible to the spot where the ball lay, but not nearer the hole, on a part of the course in the bunker that affords maximum available relief from the condition; or

(b) Under penalty of one stroke, outside the bunker, keeping the point where the ball lay directly between the hole and the spot on which the ball is dropped, with no limit to how far behind the bunker the ball may be dropped.’

Remember, that the options under Rule 25-1b only apply when there is an abnormal ground condition in the bunker. Some players mistakenly think that they have the option to drop their ball outside a bunker, under penalty of one stroke, whatever the circumstances.”

#17 RULES OF GOLF QUESTION:

“If a sprinkler head is in the line of your swing path but in no other way interferes with the stroke viz it is not affecting your stance nor is the ball lying on it, is relief permitted?”

#17 RULES OF GOLF ANSWER:

“There is no relief from a sprinkler that is in the line of a player’s swing path unless his club would make contact with any part of it during his intended swing. As sprinklers are usually flush with the ground this is unlikely. In other words there is no relief for mental interference by an immovable obstruction.

On a related issue, note that if a Club adopts the specimen Local Rule in Appendix 1, Part B, no.6, for Immovable Obstructions Close to Putting Green, a player may take relief if his ball lies off the putting green, but not in a hazard, and there is a sprinkler on or within two club-lengths of the putting green and within two club-lengths of his ball intervening on his line of play. There is no such relief unless this Local Rule is in operation.”

#18 RULES OF GOLF QUESTION:

“A player marks their ball on the putting green picks it up then wipes the mud of the ball on the surface of the green is there any penalty?”

#18 RULES OF GOLF ANSWER:

“There is no penalty unless there was intent to test the surface of the putting green. Decision 16-1d/5 states,

‘Q. May a player clean his ball by rubbing it on the putting green?

A. Yes, provided the act is not for the purpose of testing the surface of the putting green. It is recommended that a ball be cleaned in other ways to eliminate any question as to the player?s intentions.’

This is why you see professionals pass the ball to their caddie for cleaning.”

#19 RULES OF GOLF QUESTION:

“If Player A plays with a non-conforming driver and Player B at the 11th tee-box notifies his opponent that he is making a claim. Player A still used the non-conforming driver on the 11th hole.

What is the ruling before Player B plays from the 11th tee-box and after he plays from the 11th tee-box.”

#19 RULES OF GOLF ANSWER:

“Rule 4-1 states that,’the player’s clubs must conform with this Rule and the provisions, specifications and interpretations set forth in Appendix II.’ As soon as Player A made a stroke on the 11th with the non-conforming club, in breach of Rule 4-1 or 4-2, he incurred the penalty of disqualification (see the penalty statement at the end of Rule 4-2).

If Player A had not made any stroke with the non-conforming club in playing the first 10 holes, or during the 11th hole, he would have had two holes deducted from the state of the match at the end of the 11th hole; ‘*PENALTY FOR CARRYING, BUT NOT MAKING STROKE WITH, CLUB OR CLUBS IN BREACH OF RULE 4-1 or 4-2: Match play – At the conclusion of the hole at which the breach is discovered, the state of the match is adjusted by deducting one hole for each hole at which a breach occurred; maximum deduction per round – Two holes.

Obviously, he may not use the non-conforming club for the remainder of the round or he will be disqualified.

The important point here is that any stroke made with a non-conforming club disqualifies the player, whether in match play or stroke play.”

#20 RULES OF GOLF QUESTION:

“I have been told that a worm cast on the green cannot be removed. I assumed they came under the heading of a loose impediment, and as long as they can be removed by sweeping with the hand there is no penalty. Who is correct and under which rule does it fall?”

#20 RULES OF GOLF ANSWER:

“You are correct. Decision 23-1/1 states,

‘Q. Worm casts are loose impediments. By what means may such casts be removed?

A. Loose impediments may be moved by any means, except that, in removing loose impediments on the line of putt, the player must not press anything down (Rule 16-1a).’

Worm casts can therefore be removed anywhere on the course other than in a hazard.”

Visit here for more Rules of Golf questions.


Disclaimer: Whilst every attempt has been made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of this information on the Rules of Golf I am human and have been known to be wrong! Neither I, nor anyone connected with GolfSwingSecretsRevealed.com, shall be held responsible for any losses caused by reliance upon the accuracy or reliability of such information. Readers should refer to the full text of the rules and decisions as published in the official publications of the R&A and the USGA, The Rules of Golf 2008-2011 and Decisions on the Rules of Golf 2008-2009.

Turnesa makes it number four for rookies

Marc Turnesa became the fourth rookie to win on the PGA Tour this season when he lifted the title at the Justin Timberlake Shriners Hospital for Children Open in Las Vegas.

Turnesa scored a closing round of four-under 68 for a tournament-record 24-under 263 and a wire-to-wire victory, beating Matt Kuchar by a single stroke.

After sizzling opening rounds of 62 and 64, Turnesa cooled off a bit at the weekend but his scores were still too good for the chasing pack to hunt down.

At one stage, the 30-year-old was 25 under for the tournament but a bogey on the par-four 18th brought him back to 24 under. In the end, those five birdies in the last round were crucial in order to keep second-round joint leader Kuchar at bay.

Kuchar, who closed with 64, had the lead at one time but four straight pars to finish the tournament meant he was unable to gain the shot that could have taken it to a play-off.

Chad Campbell closed with a 67 for a total of 22 under to tie for third with John Mallinger (68) and Michael Allen (70).

If the name Turnesa is familiar to those with long golfing memories, it is because Marc has the pedigree. His great uncle was Jim, the 1952 PGA Championship winner. His grandfather, Mike, won six times on the PGA Tour and finished second to Ben Hogan at the 1948 PGA Championship.

According to an AP article, Mike had six golfing brothers, one of them, Joe, winning 15 times on the PGA Tour.

On the European Tour, Spaniard Alvaro Quiros scored a final round of 68 to win the Portugal Masters by three strokes at the Oceanico Victoria Golf Course in Vilamoura.

Quiroz compiled a four-round total of 19-under-par 269 with Scotland’s former British Open winner Paul Lawrie in second on 272, after a 67.

Sweden’s in-form Robert Karlsson, England’s Ross Fisher and Steve Webster shared third place on 273.

Quiroz dedicated his triumph to Spain’s most famous golfing son, Seve Ballesteros, who is recovering in hospital after undergoing surgery to remove a tumour from his brain. Quiroz said on the Tour website:

“My caddy told me that Seve always wanted to beat everybody and today I drew inspiration from thinking about the way he played his golf. Seve was and still is a personal inspiration for all of the Spaniards and we wish him well. Seve played in a different way to the rest of the world. He was something special. He was playing more with the heart than the real game, and today was one of those days.”

In Lahaina, Maui, Hawaii, Morgan Pressel claimed her second LPGA Tour victory by lifting the inaugural Kapalua Classic.

Pressel shot a final round of 69 for a total of eight-under-par 280, which was one stroke ahead of Suzann Pettersen, who also finished with a 69.

After starting the final round tied in a four-way tie for the lead, Pressel moved ahead with five birdies, althoug she also dropped two strokes.

Harrington is PGA Player of the Year for 2008

Padraig Harrington may have lost in the PGA Grand Slam of Golf event in Bermuda earlier this week, but there is no denying the impact he has had on the sport this year.

And as a reward for his achievements, highlighted by victory in the British Open and PGA Championship, the Irishman has been named PGA Player of the Year.

The world number four becomes the second European to win the title, thanks mainly to the two major titles he won this season.

The last European player to receive the award was England’s Nick Faldo, who walked away with it in 1990.

The award is given based on a player’s overall performance, including tournament wins, Order of Merit standings and scoring average.

Harrington dominated the latter part of the major season, successfully defending his Open title at Royal Birkdale before winning the PGA Championship at Oakland Hills, becoming the first European winner of the event in 78 years.

Tiger Woods, who has won nine PGA Player of the Year titles, was out of the reckoning this year despite winning the US Open.

World number one Woods was forced to skip the rest of the season because of a knee injury that he aggravated on his way to winning at Torrey Pines.

Meanwhile, Harrington was beaten by American Jim Furyk in a play-off at the Grand Slam tournament in Bermuda.

Furyk sank an eight-foot eagle putt to win at the first extra hole, relegating Harrington to his second straight runner-up position after he was beaten by Argentina’s Angel Cabrera in a play-off last year.

Furyk and Harrington completed 36 holes of regulation at four-under-par 136 at The Mid Ocean Club, both scoring two-under 68 in the final round.

South Africa’s Retief Goosen, a two-time US Open champion, carded a 71 to finish third at one-over 141 and fellow South African Trevor Immelman, the US Masters winner, was a further four strokes adrift after scoring 69.

Furyk replaced Woods in the field and was rewarded by his second title, having won the same event in 2003.